{ "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema", "name": "DecisionOS Research-to-Product Authority Map", "version": "1.0.0", "generatedAt": "2026-09-26T02:45:00Z", "governanceRule": "A scientific concept may exist without product authority; a product capability may exist without validating a broader scientific theory. Epistemic states must not be collapsed.", "concept_families": [ { "concept_id": "CONCEPT-OBSERVABLES", "canonical_name": "Decision Physics Observables (Latency, Friction, Handoffs, Loops)", "description": "Quantifiable graph-topological metrics derived strictly from event timestamps and interaction edges without content inspection.", "scientific_status": "EMPIRICALLY_SUPPORTED", "product_capability_status": "IMPLEMENTED_PRODUCTION", "product_claim_authority": "AUTHORIZED_PRODUCT_DIAGNOSTIC", "publication_authority": "PUBLIC", "authorized_claims": [ "Measures process waiting time, handoff latency, and approval cycles from metadata", "Preserves zero-content privacy architecture (no message body reading)" ], "prohibited_claims": [ "Measures employee emotion, intent, or cognitive burnout", "Determines subjective correctness of a decision" ], "governing_evidence": "STUDY-OBS-01" }, { "concept_id": "CONCEPT-ETA", "authority_code": "DP-ETA-001", "canonical_name": "Mesoscopic Structural Fragility (eta)", "description": "Mesoscopic structural fragility construct derived from retrospective pooled organizational graph topology. Strictly distinct from operational flow efficiency (Active/Elapsed latency).", "scientific_status": "SUPPORTED_BOUNDED", "reproducibility": "PARTIAL", "validation_limitations": "Retrospective pooled separation only; no held-out or leakage-safe validation established.", "product_capability_status": "RESTRICTED_EXPLORATORY", "product_claim_authority": "EXPLORATORY_STRUCTURAL_FRAGILITY_INDICATOR", "publication_authority": "PUBLIC", "authorized_claims": [ "Exploratory mesoscopic structural fragility indicator under retrospective pooled separation (DP-ETA-001)", "Identifies topological fragility zones in retrospective graph analysis" ], "prohibited_claims": [ "Predictive or forward-looking customer guarantee", "Universal physical law determining business survival", "Equating eta with operational flow efficiency (active processing time / total elapsed latency)", "Credit-rating equivalent score" ], "governing_authority": { "authority_code": "DP-ETA-001", "authority_source": "DECISION_PHYSICS_SCIENTIFIC_AUTHORITY_LEDGER_R1", "scientific_status": "SUPPORTED_BOUNDED", "construct": "Mesoscopic Structural Fragility" } }, { "concept_id": "CONCEPT-FLOW-EFFICIENCY", "authority_code": "PROD-METRIC-FLOW-01", "canonical_name": "Operational Flow Efficiency (Φ_flow)", "description": "Deterministic operational engineering ratio of active processing time to total elapsed decision latency across workflow handoffs.", "scientific_status": "DETERMINISTIC_OPERATIONAL_MEASUREMENT", "product_capability_status": "IMPLEMENTED_PRODUCTION", "product_claim_authority": "AUTHORIZED_STRUCTURAL_EFFICIENCY_INDICATOR", "publication_authority": "PUBLIC", "authorized_claims": [ "Deterministic operational metric: active processing time / total elapsed latency", "Directional indicator of workflow coordination drag and structural idle time", "Identifies waiting queue latency across multi-actor coordination chains" ], "prohibited_claims": [ "Aliasing operational flow efficiency to scientific fragility construct eta (DP-ETA-001)", "Claiming flow efficiency alone predicts organizational bankruptcy or survival" ], "governing_evidence": "STUDY-OBS-01" }, { "concept_id": "CONCEPT-SCALING-NSTAR", "canonical_name": "Scaling Inflection & N* Coordination Crossover", "description": "Observed inflection in communication entropy where coordination overhead begins to dominate active work in studied knowledge teams.", "scientific_status": "SUPPORTED_BOUNDED", "product_capability_status": "IMPLEMENTED_TOPOLOGY_DIAGNOSTIC", "product_claim_authority": "AUTHORIZED_TOPOLOGY_DEPENDENT_DIAGNOSTIC", "publication_authority": "PUBLIC", "authorized_claims": [ "Topology-dependent structural crossover observation (empirical central estimate around N* ≈ 14.7 in studied coordination cohorts)", "Advisory early friction inflection indicator for densely coupled teams" ], "prohibited_claims": [ "Universal physical constant", "Fully validated natural scaling law across arbitrary topologies", "Mandatory organizational team-splitting prescription" ], "governing_evidence": "STUDY-SCALING-01", "extent": "PARTIAL_TOPOLOGY_DEPENDENT", "guidance": "ADVISORY_ONLY", "validation_gap": "Broader external validation incomplete" }, { "concept_id": "CONCEPT-PPFT", "canonical_name": "Post-Peak Topology & Survival (R × S)", "description": "Retrospective descriptive post-peak topology and survival framework under controlled research simulation. Function, survival, and recovery are tracked as separate constructs.", "scientific_status": "SUPPORTED_BOUNDED", "product_capability_status": "BOUNDED_RETROSPECTIVE_REPORTING_ONLY", "product_claim_authority": "REPORTING_ONLY_REPAIR_REQUIRED", "publication_authority": "PUBLIC", "authorized_claims": [ "Retrospective descriptive post-peak topology indicator (R × S) under controlled research simulation", "Separate tracking of functional degradation, survival boundary, and recovery paths" ], "prohibited_claims": [ "Real-time supercritical transition trigger in production", "Phase-Proximity Flow Theory marketing redefinition without accepted supersession", "Equating qualitative visual analogies with operational proof", "Conflating function, survival, and recovery" ], "authority_code": "DP-PPFT-001", "lifecycle_status": "REPAIR_REQUIRED", "operational_scope": "REPORTING_ONLY", "governing_authority": { "authority_code": "DP-PPFT-001", "authority_source": "DECISION_PHYSICS_SCIENTIFIC_AUTHORITY_LEDGER_R1", "scientific_status": "SUPPORTED_BOUNDED", "construct": "Post-Peak Topology & Survival (R × S)" } }, { "concept_id": "CONCEPT-FAILURE-HORIZON", "canonical_name": "Failure Horizon (Research Continuity Handoff 2026-09-22)", "description": "Research frontier on structural failure boundaries. Current authority establishes: FAILURE_HORIZON_AUTHORITY = NONE; timing model is NOT_SUPPORTED.", "scientific_status": "RESEARCH_FRONTIER_NO_CURRENT_AUTHORITY", "product_capability_status": "NOT_PRODUCT_AUTHORIZED", "product_claim_authority": "PROHIBITED_FROM_PRODUCT_CLAIMS", "publication_authority": "PUBLIC", "authorized_claims": [ "FR-01, FR-03, and peer-relative Drift are bounded measurement candidates", "Research program strictly governed under Track D rare-event observational framework with unopened outcomes" ], "prohibited_claims": [ "Production failure countdown clock", "Exact failure date prediction", "Pre-failure structural state established", "Failure-specific metric established (FAILURE_HORIZON_METRIC = NO)", "Current failure horizon timing model supported", "Universal failure probability calculator" ], "governing_evidence": "STUDY-FH-01", "failure_horizon_authority": "NONE", "pre_failure_structural_state": "NOT_ESTABLISHED", "failure_specific_metric": "NOT_ESTABLISHED", "failure_horizon_metric": "NO", "current_failure_horizon_timing_model": "NOT_SUPPORTED", "governance_gates": { "D03_AUTHORIZED": false, "Q3_OUTCOME_ACCESSED": false, "R4_ACCESSED": false }, "measurement_candidates": [ "FR-01 (bounded measurement candidate)", "FR-03 (bounded measurement candidate)", "peer-relative Drift (bounded measurement candidate)" ] }, { "concept_id": "CONCEPT-OPERATIONAL-BOUNDARY", "canonical_name": "Operational Boundary Horizon", "description": "Engineering threshold identifying when queue lengths and approval backlogs exceed sustainable team processing capacity.", "scientific_status": "ENGINEERING_HEURISTIC_MODEL", "product_capability_status": "IMPLEMENTED_CAPACITY_ALERT", "product_claim_authority": "AUTHORIZED_QUEUE_SATURATION_WARNING", "publication_authority": "PUBLIC", "authorized_claims": [ "Identifies queue backlog growth rates outpacing historical throughput", "Configurable operational threshold alert" ], "prohibited_claims": [ "Predicts corporate bankruptcy", "Guarantees exact time-to-failure" ], "governing_evidence": "STUDY-OBS-01" }, { "concept_id": "CONCEPT-GOVERNED-FTL", "canonical_name": "Governed Financial Translation Layer (FTL)", "description": "Multi-tier economic translation model converting structural latency into bounded financial exposure under CFO parameterization.", "scientific_status": "METHODOLOGY_VERIFIED", "product_capability_status": "IMPLEMENTED_PASS_BOUNDED", "product_claim_authority": "AUTHORIZED_GOVERNED_EXPOSURE_MODELING", "publication_authority": "PUBLIC", "authorized_claims": [ "Translates observed decision delay into parametric modeled financial exposure under CFO models", "Separates observed financial facts, modeled exposure, and counterfactual scenario estimates", "CFO sign-off required for any business intervention modeling" ], "prohibited_claims": [ "Direct automatic EBITDA leakage causation", "Guaranteed cash savings or revenue generation", "Realized financial gains without ex-post audit" ], "governing_evidence": "STUDY-FTL-01" }, { "concept_id": "CONCEPT-CROSS-ORG", "canonical_name": "B2B Cross-Org State Observation & Friction Discovery", "description": "Bilateral authenticated protocol enabling interacting organizations to observe shared workflow latency without exposing internal data.", "scientific_status": "CAPABILITY_VERIFIED_BOUNDED", "product_capability_status": "IMPLEMENTED_PASS_BOUNDED", "product_claim_authority": "AUTHORIZED_BILATERAL_BOUNDED_OBSERVATION", "publication_authority": "PUBLIC", "authorized_claims": [ "Bilateral bounded E2E integration accepted (`PASS_BOUNDED`)", "Collaborative friction discovery between partner organizations", "Exact internal financial details remain internal by default", "Partner scoring weights are policy-governed by customer, not universal constants" ], "prohibited_claims": [ "Historical prototype status (superseded by v2.1/Current Truth)", "Universal B2B credit rating", "Public self-serve commercial release active" ], "governing_evidence": "STUDY-CROSSORG-01" }, { "concept_id": "CONCEPT-REPLAY-EVIDENCE", "canonical_name": "Decision Ledger, Temporal Replay & Cryptographic Evidence", "description": "Longitudinal audit trail providing tamper-evident historical reconstruction of organizational decision states via SHA-256 hash chains.", "scientific_status": "INFRASTRUCTURE_VERIFIED", "product_capability_status": "IMPLEMENTED_PRODUCTION", "product_claim_authority": "AUTHORIZED_TAMPER_EVIDENT_AUDIT_TRAIL", "publication_authority": "PUBLIC", "authorized_claims": [ "SHA-256 audit hash chain = CURRENT (implemented)", "RSA-PSS signing/verifying = CURRENT (implemented)", "Ed25519 key material = PRESENT (key material present for audit verification)", "Deterministic/local replay = CURRENT (implemented)", "Target ZKP verification architecture preserved as research scope (true Groth16 runtime = NOT IMPLEMENTED)" ], "prohibited_claims": [ "Active production Groth16 runtime verification (not currently proven in production)", "Active Ed25519 signing runtime in production (key material present only)", "Self-authenticating legal truth or automatic court admissibility" ], "governing_evidence": "STUDY-CRYPTO-01" }, { "concept_id": "CONCEPT-DAAS-CONTEXT", "canonical_name": "DaaS (Decision-as-a-Service) Context Infrastructure", "description": "Governed decision context delivery model for enterprise AI and executive decision support.", "scientific_status": "ARCHITECTURE_SPECIFIED", "product_capability_status": "EXISTING_ARCHITECTURE_BOUNDED", "product_claim_authority": "AUTHORIZED_CONTEXT_PROJECTION_ARCHITECTURE", "publication_authority": "PUBLIC", "authorized_claims": [ "Level A Static Context publishes informative schemas, claim ceilings, and answer contracts", "Level B Authenticated DaaS architecture is designed for tenant-isolated, role-entitled context enforcement" ], "prohibited_claims": [ "Level A static files can technically force third-party AI models to obey constraints", "Level B authenticated live provider is fully production-active (currently bounded / acceptance pending)" ], "governing_evidence": "STUDY-OBS-01" }, { "concept_id": "CONCEPT-OSRS", "canonical_name": "OSRS", "description": "Maturity framework for institutional decision observability, metadata hygiene, and audit readiness. Canonical acronym is OSRS; long-form expansion is AUTHORITY_UNRESOLVED across current authority sources.", "scientific_status": "CONSORTIUM_SPECIFICATION_DRAFT", "product_capability_status": "COMPLIANCE_ROADMAP_SPECIFICATION", "product_claim_authority": "AUTHORIZED_STANDARD_FRAMEWORK_DRAFT", "publication_authority": "PUBLIC", "authorized_claims": [ "Open specification framework for structural metadata governance and readiness scoring under OSRS acronym", "Roadmap standard for enterprise decision transparency" ], "prohibited_claims": [ "Authoritative expansion to Readiness or Risk without resolving canonical authority", "Legally mandated government standard", "Mandatory regulatory certification requirement" ], "governing_evidence": "STUDY-OBS-01", "long_form_status": "AUTHORITY_UNRESOLVED", "recorded_expansions": [ "Organizational Structural Readiness Standard", "Organizational Structural Risk Standard" ] } ] }